<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Malloys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/</link>
	<description>burn is an online feature for emerging photographers worldwide. burn is curated by magnum photographer david alan harvey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 05:43:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtomalty</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113887</link>
		<dc:creator>mtomalty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 04:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul
Also,as Thomas referenced, the 14mm 2.5 is excellent and even smaller than the 20mm
and a lot more affordable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul<br />
Also,as Thomas referenced, the 14mm 2.5 is excellent and even smaller than the 20mm<br />
and a lot more affordable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113875</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mtomalty...

I enjoyed your portfolio, I think one of my problems I&#039;m using the 14-42 power zoom - came as kit lens. I loath most zooms so I must start looking for a second hand 20mm lens, I won&#039;t be buying it new, as I haven&#039;t seen it anywhere near where I live for less than 400€!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mtomalty&#8230;</p>
<p>I enjoyed your portfolio, I think one of my problems I&#8217;m using the 14-42 power zoom &#8211; came as kit lens. I loath most zooms so I must start looking for a second hand 20mm lens, I won&#8217;t be buying it new, as I haven&#8217;t seen it anywhere near where I live for less than 400€!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Bregulla</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113866</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Bregulla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 15:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[little scrapbook on the last sunny day (last sunday in september)
http://thomasbregulla.photoshelter.com/gallery/The-last-Sunday-in-September/G000097oryFvZIqs/

photographed with GF1 and 14mm/2.5]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>little scrapbook on the last sunny day (last sunday in september)<br />
<a href="http://thomasbregulla.photoshelter.com/gallery/The-last-Sunday-in-September/G000097oryFvZIqs/" rel="nofollow">http://thomasbregulla.photoshelter.com/gallery/The-last-Sunday-in-September/G000097oryFvZIqs/</a></p>
<p>photographed with GF1 and 14mm/2.5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtomalty</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113858</link>
		<dc:creator>mtomalty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vivek

Mostly the Panasonic 20 1.7-among the best in the micro 4/3 format
To a lesser degree I use the Olympus 12mm f2.0 and Olympus 45mm 1.8
Also,recently picked up the new Olympus 75 1.8 and Voightlander 25mm .95
Both are excellent but a little too physically large for the camera and sort
of defeat the compact nature of the camera.

Jim
I do have many less saturated images. Everything shown,in all galleries, are simply placeholders
as I build the new site.
Is there something,in particular, that could assist you ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vivek</p>
<p>Mostly the Panasonic 20 1.7-among the best in the micro 4/3 format<br />
To a lesser degree I use the Olympus 12mm f2.0 and Olympus 45mm 1.8<br />
Also,recently picked up the new Olympus 75 1.8 and Voightlander 25mm .95<br />
Both are excellent but a little too physically large for the camera and sort<br />
of defeat the compact nature of the camera.</p>
<p>Jim<br />
I do have many less saturated images. Everything shown,in all galleries, are simply placeholders<br />
as I build the new site.<br />
Is there something,in particular, that could assist you ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113850</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding Imants comment on the Fuji X-100, I bought one a while back and rarely find it frustrating. Apparently, it was a horror show when it first came out, but there have been numerous software updates since that have fixed the problems people complained about when it was first released. If I were in the market for a new small camera, I&#039;d definitely look into the new Fuji with the interchangeable lenses. I&#039;m not in research mode now, so have no idea how current models compare, but when I was buying, the X-100 had significantly better image quality than the Micro 4/3 cameras. Panasonic advantages were incredibly fast focusing speed and smaller size. Seems I care about image quality more than most around here though. The X-100 is good for a small camera, but I find when I shoot a project using both that and a full frame DSLR, I end up using very few, if any, photos from the smaller sensor camera. I&#039;m afraid if I ever used a medium format camera I&#039;d be totally ruined. I&#039;d be willing to give it a try though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Imants comment on the Fuji X-100, I bought one a while back and rarely find it frustrating. Apparently, it was a horror show when it first came out, but there have been numerous software updates since that have fixed the problems people complained about when it was first released. If I were in the market for a new small camera, I&#8217;d definitely look into the new Fuji with the interchangeable lenses. I&#8217;m not in research mode now, so have no idea how current models compare, but when I was buying, the X-100 had significantly better image quality than the Micro 4/3 cameras. Panasonic advantages were incredibly fast focusing speed and smaller size. Seems I care about image quality more than most around here though. The X-100 is good for a small camera, but I find when I shoot a project using both that and a full frame DSLR, I end up using very few, if any, photos from the smaller sensor camera. I&#8217;m afraid if I ever used a medium format camera I&#8217;d be totally ruined. I&#8217;d be willing to give it a try though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Powers</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113849</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark, you really like your colors vivid! Do you have some examples shot with the GX1 with less intense colors?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, you really like your colors vivid! Do you have some examples shot with the GX1 with less intense colors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivek</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113843</link>
		<dc:creator>vivek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mtomalty  ...what lens are using with the GX1 ? ...... thnks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mtomalty  &#8230;what lens are using with the GX1 ? &#8230;&#8230; thnks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtomalty</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113835</link>
		<dc:creator>mtomalty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 23:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul,
I have to assume the GX1 is noisier than te 1DsMk2 when you consider it&#039;s a sub-$500 camera
with a sensor the size of your pinkie fingernail :)
I can&#039;t say that I have ever noticed any distasteful noise unless I&#039;m really mangling an
underexposed file in post and above 640 it smokes my M9 by 1-2 stops

Regardless of any of this, if you don&#039;t like the feel of the camera then it&#039;s never going to
work for you.

On my new temp site, I put together a GX1 gallery for a friend who was considering the camera
last week
www.marktomalty.com/designx
First group  in portfolio are all gx1 pics as are the pics in NYC gallery
The first 4 pairs in &#039;dark trees&#039; are combo of GF and GX1. The remainder are 5d3]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,<br />
I have to assume the GX1 is noisier than te 1DsMk2 when you consider it&#8217;s a sub-$500 camera<br />
with a sensor the size of your pinkie fingernail :)<br />
I can&#8217;t say that I have ever noticed any distasteful noise unless I&#8217;m really mangling an<br />
underexposed file in post and above 640 it smokes my M9 by 1-2 stops</p>
<p>Regardless of any of this, if you don&#8217;t like the feel of the camera then it&#8217;s never going to<br />
work for you.</p>
<p>On my new temp site, I put together a GX1 gallery for a friend who was considering the camera<br />
last week<br />
<a href="http://www.marktomalty.com/designx" rel="nofollow">http://www.marktomalty.com/designx</a><br />
First group  in portfolio are all gx1 pics as are the pics in NYC gallery<br />
The first 4 pairs in &#8216;dark trees&#8217; are combo of GF and GX1. The remainder are 5d3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113825</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Hyde...

If that&#039;s a Mamiya RZ you&#039;re talking about, I can wholly recommend the system. Beautifully reliable and well thought out never ever let me down and saved my butt a couple of too many times when my damn 503 Hasselblads as usual broke down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Hyde&#8230;</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s a Mamiya RZ you&#8217;re talking about, I can wholly recommend the system. Beautifully reliable and well thought out never ever let me down and saved my butt a couple of too many times when my damn 503 Hasselblads as usual broke down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113824</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mtomalty...

Don&#039;t you find the GX1 files just a bit too noisy even at iso 160? I&#039;m surprised about the noise I keep seeing in the shadows, OK it&#039;s easy to fix in Lightroom and I suppose also in camera raw, but I wasn&#039;t expecting in 2012 files with more noise than my 1DS II from iso 50 up to iso 800 which I bought in 2004!! I also agree with Imants the feel of the thing is lacking in charisma - I don&#039;t enjoy using the damn camera...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mtomalty&#8230;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you find the GX1 files just a bit too noisy even at iso 160? I&#8217;m surprised about the noise I keep seeing in the shadows, OK it&#8217;s easy to fix in Lightroom and I suppose also in camera raw, but I wasn&#8217;t expecting in 2012 files with more noise than my 1DS II from iso 50 up to iso 800 which I bought in 2004!! I also agree with Imants the feel of the thing is lacking in charisma &#8211; I don&#8217;t enjoy using the damn camera&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom hyde</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113802</link>
		<dc:creator>tom hyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty much convinced myself to go the other direction and get an RZ, while I can still use one. I can also afford it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much convinced myself to go the other direction and get an RZ, while I can still use one. I can also afford it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imants</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113801</link>
		<dc:creator>Imants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not the sensor or files just the feel of the system.......... then again I have been using the Epson RD1 of late or it could be why I found the GX1 boring.
 Maybe I should get a fuji X100,( so I can get really frustrated) I was offered a Leica M8 cheap as chips in great  condition from a friend  but I don&#039;t like the things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the sensor or files just the feel of the system&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. then again I have been using the Epson RD1 of late or it could be why I found the GX1 boring.<br />
 Maybe I should get a fuji X100,( so I can get really frustrated) I was offered a Leica M8 cheap as chips in great  condition from a friend  but I don&#8217;t like the things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtomalty</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113794</link>
		<dc:creator>mtomalty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 04:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curious Imants
I had the opposite impression when I upgraded
Find the files print larger,better and found about a stop or two of hi iso gain
Supposed to be a GX-2 with improved sensor in a month or so]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious Imants<br />
I had the opposite impression when I upgraded<br />
Find the files print larger,better and found about a stop or two of hi iso gain<br />
Supposed to be a GX-2 with improved sensor in a month or so</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imants</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113772</link>
		<dc:creator>Imants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[went from the GF1 to the GX1 ended up taking about a 70 odd shots sold it ............a mistake upgrading does not always work]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>went from the GF1 to the GX1 ended up taking about a 70 odd shots sold it &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;a mistake upgrading does not always work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113771</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DAH,

Didn&#039;t think this was an S2 shot. Curious as to why you&#039;ve totally abandoned working with the M9? Maybe you need Leica to send you one as well (I would imagine you still have M lenses)....

Also, did maybe having an appt with a &quot;name&quot; family make expectations run a little high, esp as your first shoot? I know that when that happens with me it&#039;s usually doesn&#039;t turn out the best. Maybe the parking lot family would have been a better bet.... (sad story). 

MTOMALTY,

Thanks for the offer but don&#039;t really need to know firsthand. I&#039;d hate to be tempted and clean out my savings.... Anyway, the M9 is just the sweet spot for me at the moment, though the next project(s) I have in mind I may bust out the medium format gear again but the expense of film and processing scares me vs just shooting with the M9. But the look, esp when paired with an unlikely subject (like I did with breakdancers) is unbeatable. But yeah, I usually send my digital files through a bit of A.S. Exposure as well, at least before printing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAH,</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t think this was an S2 shot. Curious as to why you&#8217;ve totally abandoned working with the M9? Maybe you need Leica to send you one as well (I would imagine you still have M lenses)&#8230;.</p>
<p>Also, did maybe having an appt with a &#8220;name&#8221; family make expectations run a little high, esp as your first shoot? I know that when that happens with me it&#8217;s usually doesn&#8217;t turn out the best. Maybe the parking lot family would have been a better bet&#8230;. (sad story). </p>
<p>MTOMALTY,</p>
<p>Thanks for the offer but don&#8217;t really need to know firsthand. I&#8217;d hate to be tempted and clean out my savings&#8230;. Anyway, the M9 is just the sweet spot for me at the moment, though the next project(s) I have in mind I may bust out the medium format gear again but the expense of film and processing scares me vs just shooting with the M9. But the look, esp when paired with an unlikely subject (like I did with breakdancers) is unbeatable. But yeah, I usually send my digital files through a bit of A.S. Exposure as well, at least before printing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113764</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David and Candy...

Just wondering if you&#039;re finding the GX1 suffers from more noise in the shadows than the GF1? Personally I&#039;m rather surprised by how noisy my GX1&#039;s sensor is compared to an admittedly full frame Canon 1Ds II camera but it&#039;s very nearly eight years old!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David and Candy&#8230;</p>
<p>Just wondering if you&#8217;re finding the GX1 suffers from more noise in the shadows than the GF1? Personally I&#8217;m rather surprised by how noisy my GX1&#8242;s sensor is compared to an admittedly full frame Canon 1Ds II camera but it&#8217;s very nearly eight years old!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david alan harvey</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113763</link>
		<dc:creator>david alan harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CHARLES...GERHARD

exactly ..dammit i went in to &quot;pro mode&quot;..an appointment, not much time, and i went in to &quot;get the publishable picture&quot; mode...just exactly what i don&#039;t want to do....

i could have done many things differently...i did not know how to use like second hand nature either the GX1 nor the Leica S2...i fumbled with both....

all in all not the way i want to work...but i am just starting...just getting loose...you can never just DO IT....there is a process....you will see it unfold here on this trip i think...

i have not even looked at my S2 pictures yet...will do it now...will let you know

cheers, david]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHARLES&#8230;GERHARD</p>
<p>exactly ..dammit i went in to &#8220;pro mode&#8221;..an appointment, not much time, and i went in to &#8220;get the publishable picture&#8221; mode&#8230;just exactly what i don&#8217;t want to do&#8230;.</p>
<p>i could have done many things differently&#8230;i did not know how to use like second hand nature either the GX1 nor the Leica S2&#8230;i fumbled with both&#8230;.</p>
<p>all in all not the way i want to work&#8230;but i am just starting&#8230;just getting loose&#8230;you can never just DO IT&#8230;.there is a process&#8230;.you will see it unfold here on this trip i think&#8230;</p>
<p>i have not even looked at my S2 pictures yet&#8230;will do it now&#8230;will let you know</p>
<p>cheers, david</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: candy</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113762</link>
		<dc:creator>candy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Charles,

David wanted me to tell you that these photos are with the gx1. He used the S2 but hasn&#039;t shared the photos from it yet. 

Candy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charles,</p>
<p>David wanted me to tell you that these photos are with the gx1. He used the S2 but hasn&#8217;t shared the photos from it yet. </p>
<p>Candy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtomalty</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113760</link>
		<dc:creator>mtomalty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will be curious,myself, to hear whether the S2 was used for this image.
My gut tells me that the distortion on the interior barn walls is a little to strong
to be coming from a 70mm lens
Also, the degree of background softness doesn&#039;t jive with my experience with the S2 and 70mm
I would expect the husband to be more out of focus
My money is on  the D800 and a 35mm.  I now await the humiliation of being wrong...again :)

Charles, if you want I can get a neutrally processed S2 file to you so you can see how a black
and white conversion works with your way of doing things.
Generally, like most hi-res digital, I find the results to be a little too clean and &#039;slick&#039;
for my taste. I usually rough up my files with a run through a tri-x or neopan 1600 profile
using Alien Skin&#039;s Exposure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will be curious,myself, to hear whether the S2 was used for this image.<br />
My gut tells me that the distortion on the interior barn walls is a little to strong<br />
to be coming from a 70mm lens<br />
Also, the degree of background softness doesn&#8217;t jive with my experience with the S2 and 70mm<br />
I would expect the husband to be more out of focus<br />
My money is on  the D800 and a 35mm.  I now await the humiliation of being wrong&#8230;again :)</p>
<p>Charles, if you want I can get a neutrally processed S2 file to you so you can see how a black<br />
and white conversion works with your way of doing things.<br />
Generally, like most hi-res digital, I find the results to be a little too clean and &#8216;slick&#8217;<br />
for my taste. I usually rough up my files with a run through a tri-x or neopan 1600 profile<br />
using Alien Skin&#8217;s Exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerhard Clausing</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/road-trips/2012/10/the-malloys/comment-page-1/#comment-113759</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerhard Clausing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=12300#comment-113759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Charles.

I should probably drag out my Mamiya again, cause nobody is letting me borrow a Leica S either.

Hope David will give us some of his views on this particular shot when he has time. 

How much ambiguity and/or intimacy is the goal in telling stories about families, how documentary or how art-oriented can photographic storytelling get to be effective? And do the smaller sensors with lenses that provide sharpness from foreground to background help or hinder in the effort? How to use all of these  effectively is what this trip will be about, seems to me ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Charles.</p>
<p>I should probably drag out my Mamiya again, cause nobody is letting me borrow a Leica S either.</p>
<p>Hope David will give us some of his views on this particular shot when he has time. </p>
<p>How much ambiguity and/or intimacy is the goal in telling stories about families, how documentary or how art-oriented can photographic storytelling get to be effective? And do the smaller sensors with lenses that provide sharpness from foreground to background help or hinder in the effort? How to use all of these  effectively is what this trip will be about, seems to me &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
