<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the saboteur by todd r. behrendt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burnmagazine.org/photographs/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/</link>
	<description>burn is an online feature for emerging photographers worldwide. burn is curated by magnum photographer david alan harvey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:17:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafal Pruszynski</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-54291</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafal Pruszynski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-54291</guid>
		<description>I agree with the nay sayers. Not only is the message unclear and not very well emphasized, I find the message once I know it to be quite one dimensional and flat. I mean to lay the blame for the financial crisis at the doorstep of a few individuals is quite naive, though very convenient. I mean if we dont understand the full picture its easy to find some scapegoats and just blame them since we ourselves are too intellectually lazy to penetrate the issue beyond the surface. For me this is just intellectual laziness and a follow-the-herd mentality displayed here by this. I realize that Burn may not be the place to discuss economics in any real depth but as the artist maybe you should have created something that has a stronger foundation than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the nay sayers. Not only is the message unclear and not very well emphasized, I find the message once I know it to be quite one dimensional and flat. I mean to lay the blame for the financial crisis at the doorstep of a few individuals is quite naive, though very convenient. I mean if we dont understand the full picture its easy to find some scapegoats and just blame them since we ourselves are too intellectually lazy to penetrate the issue beyond the surface. For me this is just intellectual laziness and a follow-the-herd mentality displayed here by this. I realize that Burn may not be the place to discuss economics in any real depth but as the artist maybe you should have created something that has a stronger foundation than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleen fonseca</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-54289</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleen fonseca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-54289</guid>
		<description>Love this! frustration, bile, pig-bled..great stand-alone imaging..keep it up!

Kathleen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this! frustration, bile, pig-bled..great stand-alone imaging..keep it up!</p>
<p>Kathleen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47630</link>
		<dc:creator>wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47630</guid>
		<description>locus...
morphine..
pig...
displacement
antagonistic
secretion..
find them!
**
would like to see more layers,
more information..
the ink stops me...
interesting
and
complicated....
***</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>locus&#8230;<br />
morphine..<br />
pig&#8230;<br />
displacement<br />
antagonistic<br />
secretion..<br />
find them!<br />
**<br />
would like to see more layers,<br />
more information..<br />
the ink stops me&#8230;<br />
interesting<br />
and<br />
complicated&#8230;.<br />
***</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47627</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47627</guid>
		<description>&quot;I dunno. You can make love in a darkroom, too, but it still isn’t photography.&quot;  &lt;- funny.

I am definitely feeling that sentiment.  
My two cents... A bit cliche.  It&#039;s message is weak.
I feel like this is getting by purely on it&#039;s traditional darkroom process.
Maybe that&#039;s enough...
But what if there was no dark room, just a &#039;shopped&#039; composition? What if I photographed a well lit, flat shot of one of my paintings cropping only the canvas?  How about a scanned image of a drawing? Scanners are in a sense (it&#039;s a stretch I realize) a camera too. 

I&#039;m taking the piss, for the most part, but this photo brings up the notion that BURN is opening it&#039;s arms to Emerging Graphic Designers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I dunno. You can make love in a darkroom, too, but it still isn’t photography.&#8221;  &lt;- funny.</p>
<p>I am definitely feeling that sentiment.<br />
My two cents&#8230; A bit cliche.  It&#039;s message is weak.<br />
I feel like this is getting by purely on it&#039;s traditional darkroom process.<br />
Maybe that&#039;s enough&#8230;<br />
But what if there was no dark room, just a &#039;shopped&#039; composition? What if I photographed a well lit, flat shot of one of my paintings cropping only the canvas?  How about a scanned image of a drawing? Scanners are in a sense (it&#039;s a stretch I realize) a camera too. </p>
<p>I&#039;m taking the piss, for the most part, but this photo brings up the notion that BURN is opening it&#039;s arms to Emerging Graphic Designers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjarte Edvardsen</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47624</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjarte Edvardsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47624</guid>
		<description>I like the energy in this one. Reminds of different cover art for experimental music that I listen to. I bet Kim Hiorthøy should be a big inspiration for you, he&#039;s made every cover art for the label Rune Grammofon: www.runegrammofon.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the energy in this one. Reminds of different cover art for experimental music that I listen to. I bet Kim Hiorthøy should be a big inspiration for you, he&#8217;s made every cover art for the label Rune Grammofon: <a href="http://www.runegrammofon.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.runegrammofon.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike R</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47623</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47623</guid>
		<description>Like it Todd, like it a lot: well out of the box. As John Gladdy says, it belongs on the wall.



Best,


Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it Todd, like it a lot: well out of the box. As John Gladdy says, it belongs on the wall.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Roseman</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47614</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Roseman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 05:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47614</guid>
		<description>I feel like I want to say, &quot;Rock it!&quot;...so I will, Todd, you should rock the shit out of this.  But...like others, I am a bit confused about the message or the intent.  I love that you are using a darkroom experimentally, and abstract is awesome, but I need a bit more of your view explained, either with the employment of words or visual text.  A dark faceless head explosion paired with exposed, almost x-rayed innards coupled with latin and scientific jargon, and then the message, &quot;Find them!&quot; is a lot going on without the context explained much.  Kind of makes me think a confused Shepard Fairey...this isn&#039;t to begrudge or belittle your intent..quite the opposite actually.  I think that you have a lot of great really artistic ideas, but I think that you need to hone them into speaking one message per (compiled) image.  The impact would be clearer and greater, and your intent more recognizable.  Or, maybe, I just seek more explanation of this image.  Either way, I love the artistic endeavor and approach you have decided to take.  Just more explanation and exploration is what I would like as the viewer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like I want to say, &#8220;Rock it!&#8221;&#8230;so I will, Todd, you should rock the shit out of this.  But&#8230;like others, I am a bit confused about the message or the intent.  I love that you are using a darkroom experimentally, and abstract is awesome, but I need a bit more of your view explained, either with the employment of words or visual text.  A dark faceless head explosion paired with exposed, almost x-rayed innards coupled with latin and scientific jargon, and then the message, &#8220;Find them!&#8221; is a lot going on without the context explained much.  Kind of makes me think a confused Shepard Fairey&#8230;this isn&#8217;t to begrudge or belittle your intent..quite the opposite actually.  I think that you have a lot of great really artistic ideas, but I think that you need to hone them into speaking one message per (compiled) image.  The impact would be clearer and greater, and your intent more recognizable.  Or, maybe, I just seek more explanation of this image.  Either way, I love the artistic endeavor and approach you have decided to take.  Just more explanation and exploration is what I would like as the viewer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia Lay-Dorsey</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47572</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Lay-Dorsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47572</guid>
		<description>Love the idea and the use of collage to make your point, but I find the image to be unresolved. I&#039;d like to see you tackle this again using more layers both physically and emotionally. If I hadn&#039;t read the text I wouldn&#039;t know to what it referred. Symbolism is great but it needs to be connected to some realistic content to be effective. Keep going...

Patricia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the idea and the use of collage to make your point, but I find the image to be unresolved. I&#8217;d like to see you tackle this again using more layers both physically and emotionally. If I hadn&#8217;t read the text I wouldn&#8217;t know to what it referred. Symbolism is great but it needs to be connected to some realistic content to be effective. Keep going&#8230;</p>
<p>Patricia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: panos skoulidas</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47542</link>
		<dc:creator>panos skoulidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47542</guid>
		<description>Likes it:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Likes it:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herve</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47532</link>
		<dc:creator>Herve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47532</guid>
		<description>Hopefully, the greedy bastards won&#039;t put the galleries exhibiting your work out of business... That&#039;s all we can ask!  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully, the greedy bastards won&#8217;t put the galleries exhibiting your work out of business&#8230; That&#8217;s all we can ask!  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Powers</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47529</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47529</guid>
		<description>Well, it does matter if it is photography. This is a site for emerging photographers, not emerging graphic artists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it does matter if it is photography. This is a site for emerging photographers, not emerging graphic artists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duckrabbit</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47525</link>
		<dc:creator>duckrabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47525</guid>
		<description>just see it for what it is, or not.

discussions about whether this is photography (or not) are pointless.

Why don&#039;t you just crack out of that mindset ... its what kills photography, turns it into a scene that can only celebrates itself whilst everyone else is getting love for what they do, not what format they do it in.

Nothing is sacred. My God Capa faked his photos, Jesus was just a carpenter (and a poet).

I mean do you like it?  Does it say something to you?

My verdict:

SHIT HOT TODD, SHIT HOT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just see it for what it is, or not.</p>
<p>discussions about whether this is photography (or not) are pointless.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you just crack out of that mindset &#8230; its what kills photography, turns it into a scene that can only celebrates itself whilst everyone else is getting love for what they do, not what format they do it in.</p>
<p>Nothing is sacred. My God Capa faked his photos, Jesus was just a carpenter (and a poet).</p>
<p>I mean do you like it?  Does it say something to you?</p>
<p>My verdict:</p>
<p>SHIT HOT TODD, SHIT HOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luzz</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47522</link>
		<dc:creator>luzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47522</guid>
		<description>illustration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>illustration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Marovich</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47515</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Marovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47515</guid>
		<description>&quot;You can make love in a darkroom, too, but it still isn’t photography.&quot;

.... well it can be.... but that is something different</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You can make love in a darkroom, too, but it still isn’t photography.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;. well it can be&#8230;. but that is something different</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Powers</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47513</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47513</guid>
		<description>I dunno. You can make love in a darkroom, too, but it still isn&#039;t photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno. You can make love in a darkroom, too, but it still isn&#8217;t photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john gladdy</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47511</link>
		<dc:creator>john gladdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47511</guid>
		<description>Jim. My guess is its a contact printed digineg, so.....yep its photography. welcome to the world.
I dont really really buy/care about the political angle behind this at all, but if it ever came as a 20x16 lith i would certainly have one. 
john</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim. My guess is its a contact printed digineg, so&#8230;..yep its photography. welcome to the world.<br />
I dont really really buy/care about the political angle behind this at all, but if it ever came as a 20&#215;16 lith i would certainly have one.<br />
john</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47500</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47500</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not making any judgement on what might conventionally define &#039;photography&#039; but I like your image.  I&#039;d like to see some more context - whether this might mean more images or a written narrative, I&#039;m not sure...

My reaction to this image is to feel some of the anger that is venting from a problem that we have all constructed in one way or another... we are compliant and that is (part of) the problem.  This works for me.

SteveM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not making any judgement on what might conventionally define &#8216;photography&#8217; but I like your image.  I&#8217;d like to see some more context &#8211; whether this might mean more images or a written narrative, I&#8217;m not sure&#8230;</p>
<p>My reaction to this image is to feel some of the anger that is venting from a problem that we have all constructed in one way or another&#8230; we are compliant and that is (part of) the problem.  This works for me.</p>
<p>SteveM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Powers</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47497</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47497</guid>
		<description>This is supposed to be photography?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is supposed to be photography?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivek</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47494</link>
		<dc:creator>vivek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47494</guid>
		<description>BAD ASS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BAD ASS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndreaC</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/works-in-progress/2009/08/the-saboteur-by-todd-r-behrendt/comment-page-1/#comment-47487</link>
		<dc:creator>AndreaC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=3918#comment-47487</guid>
		<description>I wish it was darker. (Darker in tones, and also in meaning, but of course, the one would affect the other). I like the idea as you&#039;ve written it but I feel you haven&#039;t quite pulled it off. I love the splatter over the blacked out head. The intestines and the bits and pieces of this picture although I am not sure about the text and how it fits in. It looks rather like science jargon. Maybe it all needs to be a lot gorier. A lot angrier.

Have you ever seen Joel Peter Witkins work, not that it&#039;s quite like this but it is dark and you feel that evil lurks there. I want to see more evil (or anger) in your picture. Well that&#039;s what I think anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish it was darker. (Darker in tones, and also in meaning, but of course, the one would affect the other). I like the idea as you&#8217;ve written it but I feel you haven&#8217;t quite pulled it off. I love the splatter over the blacked out head. The intestines and the bits and pieces of this picture although I am not sure about the text and how it fits in. It looks rather like science jargon. Maybe it all needs to be a lot gorier. A lot angrier.</p>
<p>Have you ever seen Joel Peter Witkins work, not that it&#8217;s quite like this but it is dark and you feel that evil lurks there. I want to see more evil (or anger) in your picture. Well that&#8217;s what I think anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

