I can easily see this as illustrations in a children’s book, accompanied by well-written, simple words. Then I think it capture me.

Fortunately, I am in a spot with very weak wifi and so the pictures take a long time to change and I wind up looking at them a bit longer than I normally would online.

PS: You are a beautiful, mysterious, lady.

Patricia, lovely to see you comment here, miss your presence. Hope all is well.

First of all, congratulations on being published in BURN! :))

My first vision of the moors, as with MW, was through the family Bronte and all their ghost stories ;) and through other books…and then i spend a week rambling about there with my Aunt when I was 14. Funny, because at that time the sun was strong and every moor or hill or lake or wood or village i visited was all lit up by the achy and brilliant sun. then i thought, damn, what was it with the Bronte’s or the BBC with foggy, dodgy, ghost-ridden Moors ;)))…anyway….

What I do like about your approach is that you have personalized your own personal and romantic (Romantic in the sense of Romanticism, gothic, etc) relationship to your experience of the moors, which does seem literary. I am ALWAYS all for personal vision and personal expression and for sure re-creation. Camera is not just an eye, but can also be a brush, a scalpel, a chisel, a gun. For me, the images that work the strongest are those where the Moors, or rather, the Land is the real subject and the model (you?) is an extension of that, rather than those with a woman as the center….like ALOT #3 (maybe my favorite), 4, 6 :)))…those images, for me, go beyond just pictorial representation of an idea, but become cinematic and lyrical expressions of that lovely twining of body and land…in a world: real mystery….

anyway, i’m sure Jane Eyre Catherine or the French Lieutenant’s Woman would be pleased with their portrait as 5 as well :))

thanks again for sharing, and best of luck as you pursue your work :))

cheers
bob