<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: tom hyde &#8211; after the fall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/</link>
	<description>burn is an online feature for emerging photographers worldwide. burn is curated by magnum photographer david alan harvey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:55:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: After the Fall : statement</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-100042</link>
		<dc:creator>After the Fall : statement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-100042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Foundation, a non-profit created by the members of Magnum Photos. The essay currently appears on Burn Magazine. Judges for the 2011 grant were Trent Parke, Narelle Autio, Maggie Steber, and Barbara Strauss.     [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Foundation, a non-profit created by the members of Magnum Photos. The essay currently appears on Burn Magazine. Judges for the 2011 grant were Trent Parke, Narelle Autio, Maggie Steber, and Barbara Strauss.     [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominik Dunsch</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99786</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominik Dunsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 21:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TOM - I know I&#039;m a little late here, and I&#039;m pretty sure that all those comments under your essay use nicer, better words to show their joy and respect and awe. But this is exactly what I feel, so: congrats for this fab essay, which is a fantastic start for a work in progress which I&#039;m surely keen to follow in the future. Thanks for this...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TOM &#8211; I know I&#8217;m a little late here, and I&#8217;m pretty sure that all those comments under your essay use nicer, better words to show their joy and respect and awe. But this is exactly what I feel, so: congrats for this fab essay, which is a fantastic start for a work in progress which I&#8217;m surely keen to follow in the future. Thanks for this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99610</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t stop seeing this essay. Truly magnificent. Both words and photographs are synced. Congrats!
Thanks Tom and Burn!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t stop seeing this essay. Truly magnificent. Both words and photographs are synced. Congrats!<br />
Thanks Tom and Burn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuesday 27 September 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99531</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesday 27 September 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] websiteLucy Nicholson: A Gay Military Family (Reuters: September 2011)Tom Hyde: After the Fall (burn: September 2011)From VII&#8230;Anastasia Taylor-Lind in VII magazine&#8230;see later in this [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] websiteLucy Nicholson: A Gay Military Family (Reuters: September 2011)Tom Hyde: After the Fall (burn: September 2011)From VII&#8230;Anastasia Taylor-Lind in VII magazine&#8230;see later in this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Roseman</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99308</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Roseman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 05:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome essay.  #13 is incredible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome essay.  #13 is incredible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sidney Atkins</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99227</link>
		<dc:creator>Sidney Atkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TOM,

There are a number of pertinent articles, an interactive map, and a good video on western forests on the New York Times online site this morning (Saturday). Check it out if you have the chance...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TOM,</p>
<p>There are a number of pertinent articles, an interactive map, and a good video on western forests on the New York Times online site this morning (Saturday). Check it out if you have the chance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Lafleur</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99185</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Lafleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 04:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oops, wrong dialogue, boy, I&#039;m batting 100 tonight]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, wrong dialogue, boy, I&#8217;m batting 100 tonight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Lafleur</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99184</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Lafleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 04:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK OK, there is an address, the hordes will descend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK OK, there is an address, the hordes will descend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom hyde – after the fall &#124; The Click</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99179</link>
		<dc:creator>tom hyde – after the fall &#124; The Click</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] hyde – after the fall  Posted on  September 27, 2011  by  Trent Nelson   burn:  Here it is all about timber, and paper, and fishing. Product. Extraction and subjugation in the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hyde – after the fall  Posted on  September 27, 2011  by  Trent Nelson   burn:  Here it is all about timber, and paper, and fishing. Product. Extraction and subjugation in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maryannephoto@aol.com</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99123</link>
		<dc:creator>maryannephoto@aol.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love this...it is really wonderful! 13 is AMAZING!!!  also love 4, 14, 15, and 18.  
congratulations...great work!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this&#8230;it is really wonderful! 13 is AMAZING!!!  also love 4, 14, 15, and 18.<br />
congratulations&#8230;great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom hyde</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99095</link>
		<dc:creator>tom hyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sidney, I always appreciate your thoughts. Certainly this is just the beginning with many possibilities. Thanks for the great expectations. :)) There are relatively few books, exhibitions, etc. that tell, or show, the story of this place, well. ... ah, there is heavy fog out my window, must go! :))]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sidney, I always appreciate your thoughts. Certainly this is just the beginning with many possibilities. Thanks for the great expectations. :)) There are relatively few books, exhibitions, etc. that tell, or show, the story of this place, well. &#8230; ah, there is heavy fog out my window, must go! :))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Lafleur</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99079</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Lafleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mark, great shot. The place has never been the same since the windstorm. It used to be so dark in there that you could barely take pictures handheld. Now it is very light. The windstorm did all the damage because of the clear cutting up the valley from the site. Without the buffering effect of the whole forest, the stand is very vulnerable to high winds that roar through the pass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mark, great shot. The place has never been the same since the windstorm. It used to be so dark in there that you could barely take pictures handheld. Now it is very light. The windstorm did all the damage because of the clear cutting up the valley from the site. Without the buffering effect of the whole forest, the stand is very vulnerable to high winds that roar through the pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtomalty</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99078</link>
		<dc:creator>mtomalty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gordon

Here&#039;s one from Cathedral Grove from 8-9 years ago shortly after a windstorm took
down a number of trees.

http://www.marktomalty.com/#/GALLERIES/Panoramic/9]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gordon</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one from Cathedral Grove from 8-9 years ago shortly after a windstorm took<br />
down a number of trees.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marktomalty.com/#/GALLERIES/Panoramic/9" rel="nofollow">http://www.marktomalty.com/#/GALLERIES/Panoramic/9</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Lafleur</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99076</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Lafleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 03:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mtomalty

http://www.pbase.com/glafleur/image/117094134

Here is Martha in front of an old growth cedar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mtomalty</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbase.com/glafleur/image/117094134" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbase.com/glafleur/image/117094134</a></p>
<p>Here is Martha in front of an old growth cedar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99071</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m from a flat place with no forests to speak of, certainly nothing approaching an old growth forest. Growing up I thought heaven was to be found in the small stands that were left by farmers so they&#039;d have a place to hunt. Then when we got our drivers licenses, we&#039;d drive about 75 miles to a place with small hills and a national forest, all land that had been cut in the early 20th century. Although that all sounds ugly, it isn&#039;t. These new forests are very beautiful, not just compared to nothing, but in and of themselves. It&#039;s only when we come to experience the real thing that they may lose something in our estimation. And I suspect most of us never see the real thing. I&#039;m not even sure I have. I know that at least two of the old growth forests I&#039;ve spent time in allowed the removal of naturally fallen trees and I suspect that is just a slower way for the forest to die. I&#039;m sure it leaves it disfigured and weak. It was only on an island off Alaska where it was obvious that trees had fallen and decayed and it appeared that more trees had fallen and decayed on top of them for a long, long time. But I don&#039;t know. As Tom mentions, the turnaround can be pretty fast in a rain forest. 

Anyway, my point is that I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessarily wrong to show the beauty of these places through photography. Same thing with the decaying towns. They all have aspects of beauty about them. It can&#039;t all be Yosemite. And a single leaf, or a stand of trees bathed in the light of a sawmill can be just as beautiful as the grandest canyon. It&#039;s just more difficult to see, and to capture and communicate to others. No, and that&#039;s not a bad thing to do. If more of us could appreciate the simple beauty around them, the world would be a better place. And we&#039;d probably put up a better fight to preserve it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m from a flat place with no forests to speak of, certainly nothing approaching an old growth forest. Growing up I thought heaven was to be found in the small stands that were left by farmers so they&#8217;d have a place to hunt. Then when we got our drivers licenses, we&#8217;d drive about 75 miles to a place with small hills and a national forest, all land that had been cut in the early 20th century. Although that all sounds ugly, it isn&#8217;t. These new forests are very beautiful, not just compared to nothing, but in and of themselves. It&#8217;s only when we come to experience the real thing that they may lose something in our estimation. And I suspect most of us never see the real thing. I&#8217;m not even sure I have. I know that at least two of the old growth forests I&#8217;ve spent time in allowed the removal of naturally fallen trees and I suspect that is just a slower way for the forest to die. I&#8217;m sure it leaves it disfigured and weak. It was only on an island off Alaska where it was obvious that trees had fallen and decayed and it appeared that more trees had fallen and decayed on top of them for a long, long time. But I don&#8217;t know. As Tom mentions, the turnaround can be pretty fast in a rain forest. </p>
<p>Anyway, my point is that I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessarily wrong to show the beauty of these places through photography. Same thing with the decaying towns. They all have aspects of beauty about them. It can&#8217;t all be Yosemite. And a single leaf, or a stand of trees bathed in the light of a sawmill can be just as beautiful as the grandest canyon. It&#8217;s just more difficult to see, and to capture and communicate to others. No, and that&#8217;s not a bad thing to do. If more of us could appreciate the simple beauty around them, the world would be a better place. And we&#8217;d probably put up a better fight to preserve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pomara</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99070</link>
		<dc:creator>pomara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ground control to Major Tom...

Righteous stuff.

Thanks to Burn for letting this be shown.

Can&#039;t wait for the next chapter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ground control to Major Tom&#8230;</p>
<p>Righteous stuff.</p>
<p>Thanks to Burn for letting this be shown.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait for the next chapter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hladun</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99067</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hladun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I may have written poorly the first sentence above. There shouldn&#039;t necessarily, or preferably, be a separation of intent from a photograph&#039;s message or meaning. The quote of David&#039;s (I cannot find it, and I&#039;ve searched for it feverishly) was something like: &quot;Don&#039;t show me how you felt; show me the feelings of the image&quot;. I take that to mean, where there is some sort of differentiation, that the intent of the photographer is sub-ordinate to the intent of the image. All other things being equal...ideally they should go hand-in-hand.

How it affects my appreciation of this essay comes from the way Tom has so well connected himself to the forest. I feel it, its fertility, its moisture. It is as I feel my forest. As Gordon says, &quot;These photographs are poetry, and are better just felt.&quot; It would be great to see Tom&#039;s vibrating connection continue in this spirit manner with the essay. Capturing the spirit of the forest supercedes the content of the artist statement; maybe my confusion lies in the poetry of the images versus the prose of Tom&#039;s statement. A disconnect between the linear and the lateral.

Heck, when it comes to being at the smart-table, it&#039;s quite normal for me to be the one sitting on the kiddie stool. It took me an honest 20 seconds to even realize the figure in image 13. Go figure...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I may have written poorly the first sentence above. There shouldn&#8217;t necessarily, or preferably, be a separation of intent from a photograph&#8217;s message or meaning. The quote of David&#8217;s (I cannot find it, and I&#8217;ve searched for it feverishly) was something like: &#8220;Don&#8217;t show me how you felt; show me the feelings of the image&#8221;. I take that to mean, where there is some sort of differentiation, that the intent of the photographer is sub-ordinate to the intent of the image. All other things being equal&#8230;ideally they should go hand-in-hand.</p>
<p>How it affects my appreciation of this essay comes from the way Tom has so well connected himself to the forest. I feel it, its fertility, its moisture. It is as I feel my forest. As Gordon says, &#8220;These photographs are poetry, and are better just felt.&#8221; It would be great to see Tom&#8217;s vibrating connection continue in this spirit manner with the essay. Capturing the spirit of the forest supercedes the content of the artist statement; maybe my confusion lies in the poetry of the images versus the prose of Tom&#8217;s statement. A disconnect between the linear and the lateral.</p>
<p>Heck, when it comes to being at the smart-table, it&#8217;s quite normal for me to be the one sitting on the kiddie stool. It took me an honest 20 seconds to even realize the figure in image 13. Go figure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtomalty</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99049</link>
		<dc:creator>mtomalty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, our place there is surrounded by towering trees and we are constantly beating back the woods to keep nature from reclaiming the house. http://www.pbase.com/glafleur/image/131617177

Imagine standing beneath that tree instead of beside that stump :)

I get your,point, though, and the same logic applies to eating meat.
I consume as much wood and meat (though I don&#039;t eat much wood- bad porn joke in there somewhere!)
as the next person but, at the  very least we should be adopting more responsible and humane
practices.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, our place there is surrounded by towering trees and we are constantly beating back the woods to keep nature from reclaiming the house. <a href="http://www.pbase.com/glafleur/image/131617177" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbase.com/glafleur/image/131617177</a></p>
<p>Imagine standing beneath that tree instead of beside that stump :)</p>
<p>I get your,point, though, and the same logic applies to eating meat.<br />
I consume as much wood and meat (though I don&#8217;t eat much wood- bad porn joke in there somewhere!)<br />
as the next person but, at the  very least we should be adopting more responsible and humane<br />
practices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sidney Atkins</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99048</link>
		<dc:creator>Sidney Atkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TOM,

Many of the photos are quite beautiful, you don&#039;t need me to tell you that.
And the artist statement is certainly evocative. How the two fit together is the problem.

Since I have been so close to this world of the resource-industry-based rural Northwest for so long, or maybe because of my background as more geographer than art photographer, despite the beauty of the photos I felt something was not quite right here, or maybe that something was missing... Like you had only begun to tell the story, both in pictures and words. In your written response to the comments you certainly acknowledge that... so, as a fragment of a work in progress, I can see the potential here for something really meaningful and deep... but somehow, between the artistic vision you have laid down with these few photos on the one hand, and the ambition of what it is you are hoping to communicate on the other, there remains a vast territory to fill in... some of that can be filled in with the imagination of the viewers, perhaps, but to me anyway it seems like you would need a whole book at least of both lots more photographs and more text to really get across what you are trying to say... Am I projecting my own ambitions and values here, or being too demanding, or not acknowledging enough what you have already done??? Hard to say... but I have very high expectations for what you are capable of, and so I am seeing these pictures and words as just beginning steps in a much larger project.

BURN tends to be about the photos, and photographers... nothing wrong with that, but there does seem to be a bias towards the values of &quot;pure photography&quot; in telling stories without words, stories that need no words... I understand that, but as you know I come from a different tradition in which photographs are an essential part of the story but never enough on their own... and I think, with what I know about your background and your abilities as a writer, that the same may be true for you to some extent... so, I urge you to consider the idea of a book, or an exhibition, or an &quot;app&quot; or multi-media piece, which uses both photographs and words (and maybe sound as well) as the ultimate vehicle for the project of getting across what it is you are trying to communicate about the place where you live.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TOM,</p>
<p>Many of the photos are quite beautiful, you don&#8217;t need me to tell you that.<br />
And the artist statement is certainly evocative. How the two fit together is the problem.</p>
<p>Since I have been so close to this world of the resource-industry-based rural Northwest for so long, or maybe because of my background as more geographer than art photographer, despite the beauty of the photos I felt something was not quite right here, or maybe that something was missing&#8230; Like you had only begun to tell the story, both in pictures and words. In your written response to the comments you certainly acknowledge that&#8230; so, as a fragment of a work in progress, I can see the potential here for something really meaningful and deep&#8230; but somehow, between the artistic vision you have laid down with these few photos on the one hand, and the ambition of what it is you are hoping to communicate on the other, there remains a vast territory to fill in&#8230; some of that can be filled in with the imagination of the viewers, perhaps, but to me anyway it seems like you would need a whole book at least of both lots more photographs and more text to really get across what you are trying to say&#8230; Am I projecting my own ambitions and values here, or being too demanding, or not acknowledging enough what you have already done??? Hard to say&#8230; but I have very high expectations for what you are capable of, and so I am seeing these pictures and words as just beginning steps in a much larger project.</p>
<p>BURN tends to be about the photos, and photographers&#8230; nothing wrong with that, but there does seem to be a bias towards the values of &#8220;pure photography&#8221; in telling stories without words, stories that need no words&#8230; I understand that, but as you know I come from a different tradition in which photographs are an essential part of the story but never enough on their own&#8230; and I think, with what I know about your background and your abilities as a writer, that the same may be true for you to some extent&#8230; so, I urge you to consider the idea of a book, or an exhibition, or an &#8220;app&#8221; or multi-media piece, which uses both photographs and words (and maybe sound as well) as the ultimate vehicle for the project of getting across what it is you are trying to communicate about the place where you live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Lafleur</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/09/tom-hyde-after-the-fall/comment-page-2/#comment-99047</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Lafleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=10335#comment-99047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mtomalty
I don&#039;t know. I think Tom&#039;s essay here gives much food for thought. Not that I&#039;m a defender of the forest industry. Forestry is not in itself an evil practice. Most of us live in wood frame houses which sit on land that was formerly virgin forest, and have a huge wad of paper delivered to our doors every morning. The same attitudes and forces that cut the forests down also aggressivly fight forest fires (not always a good idea). I&#039;ve been reading recently of how much forest has been returning to large areas partially due to urbanization of populations worldwide. In tropical climes, the forest is being seen to regenerate much more quickly than expected.
Lasqueti Island is in Georgia Strait between the mainland and Vancouver Island. It was clear-cut in the 1930s.  Now, our place there is surrounded by towering trees and we are constantly beating back the woods to keep nature from reclaiming the house. http://www.pbase.com/glafleur/image/131617177]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mtomalty<br />
I don&#8217;t know. I think Tom&#8217;s essay here gives much food for thought. Not that I&#8217;m a defender of the forest industry. Forestry is not in itself an evil practice. Most of us live in wood frame houses which sit on land that was formerly virgin forest, and have a huge wad of paper delivered to our doors every morning. The same attitudes and forces that cut the forests down also aggressivly fight forest fires (not always a good idea). I&#8217;ve been reading recently of how much forest has been returning to large areas partially due to urbanization of populations worldwide. In tropical climes, the forest is being seen to regenerate much more quickly than expected.<br />
Lasqueti Island is in Georgia Strait between the mainland and Vancouver Island. It was clear-cut in the 1930s.  Now, our place there is surrounded by towering trees and we are constantly beating back the woods to keep nature from reclaiming the house. <a href="http://www.pbase.com/glafleur/image/131617177" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbase.com/glafleur/image/131617177</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
