<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: michael webster &#8211; brooklyn carnival</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/</link>
	<description>burn is an online feature for emerging photographers worldwide. burn is curated by magnum photographer david alan harvey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:05:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-3/#comment-113535</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-113535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul, sorry it&#039;s taken so long for me to get back to you on this. But to answer your question, no, the comments here didn&#039;t at all change my perspective on how I&#039;d shoot the Brooklyn Carnival. I&#039;m very open to criticism and appreciate it very much, but in this case, by the time it was published I&#039;d already been working on it for many years and was committed to my approach. I did pretty much the exact same essay in 2011, and consider it to be the definitive take. 

http://mwebphoto.photoshelter.com/gallery-slideshow/G0000YpAdV1dBQWM/C0000q4JPow_tBeI?start=

And thanks again to everyone for their consideration and comments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, sorry it&#8217;s taken so long for me to get back to you on this. But to answer your question, no, the comments here didn&#8217;t at all change my perspective on how I&#8217;d shoot the Brooklyn Carnival. I&#8217;m very open to criticism and appreciate it very much, but in this case, by the time it was published I&#8217;d already been working on it for many years and was committed to my approach. I did pretty much the exact same essay in 2011, and consider it to be the definitive take. </p>
<p><a href="http://mwebphoto.photoshelter.com/gallery-slideshow/G0000YpAdV1dBQWM/C0000q4JPow_tBeI?start=" rel="nofollow">http://mwebphoto.photoshelter.com/gallery-slideshow/G0000YpAdV1dBQWM/C0000q4JPow_tBeI?start=</a></p>
<p>And thanks again to everyone for their consideration and comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saturday 12 March 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-3/#comment-89067</link>
		<dc:creator>Saturday 12 March 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-89067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Gachet: Tunupa&#8217;s Tears (Panos: March 2011) BoliviaFeatures and Essays - Michael Webster: Brooklyn Carnival (Burn: March 2011)Features and Essays - Finbarr O&#8217;Reilly: Looking Through Afghanistan’s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gachet: Tunupa&#8217;s Tears (Panos: March 2011) BoliviaFeatures and Essays &#8211; Michael Webster: Brooklyn Carnival (Burn: March 2011)Features and Essays &#8211; Finbarr O&#8217;Reilly: Looking Through Afghanistan’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saturday 12 March 2011 &#171; P H O T O J O U R N A L I S M L I N K S</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-88446</link>
		<dc:creator>Saturday 12 March 2011 &#171; P H O T O J O U R N A L I S M L I N K S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-88446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and Essays - Michael Webster: Brooklyn Carnival (Burn: March [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Essays &#8211; Michael Webster: Brooklyn Carnival (Burn: March [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-87039</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-87039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mw...

Have the comments and views posted here changed your perspective and how you will document this Brooklyn Carnival in the future?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mw&#8230;</p>
<p>Have the comments and views posted here changed your perspective and how you will document this Brooklyn Carnival in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sebastien VM</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-87036</link>
		<dc:creator>sebastien VM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-87036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harvey&#039;s Style!

Nice work, nice lights! Instinctive and spontaneous!
Obviously burning!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harvey&#8217;s Style!</p>
<p>Nice work, nice lights! Instinctive and spontaneous!<br />
Obviously burning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Framers Intent</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86623</link>
		<dc:creator>Framers Intent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PAUL - just saw yours. We cross-posted!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PAUL &#8211; just saw yours. We cross-posted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Framers Intent</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86622</link>
		<dc:creator>Framers Intent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DAH and PANOS - *blushes* I hail from &quot;the wrong side of the tracks&quot; although, it being over &#039;ere in Poor Ol&#039; Blighty guv&#039;nor, that prob&#039;ly means I&#039;m still posh compared to you&#039;s Yanks. Anyone need a chimney sweep? ;-P

It wasn&#039;t so much a bar room brawl, more the start of handbags at dawn, but it was dragging away from Michael&#039;s good work and discussing that too much, I felt. And it did seem to be just a misunderstanding over nothing.

Panos i I was always under the (perhaps quite mistaken) impression that the 420 was all about blunts? That&#039;s probably why you didn&#039;t know the L term. Yup.  ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAH and PANOS &#8211; *blushes* I hail from &#8220;the wrong side of the tracks&#8221; although, it being over &#8216;ere in Poor Ol&#8217; Blighty guv&#8217;nor, that prob&#8217;ly means I&#8217;m still posh compared to you&#8217;s Yanks. Anyone need a chimney sweep? ;-P</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t so much a bar room brawl, more the start of handbags at dawn, but it was dragging away from Michael&#8217;s good work and discussing that too much, I felt. And it did seem to be just a misunderstanding over nothing.</p>
<p>Panos i I was always under the (perhaps quite mistaken) impression that the 420 was all about blunts? That&#8217;s probably why you didn&#8217;t know the L term. Yup.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86621</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The younger Spanish generation also refer to a joint as an &quot;L&quot; or as they pronounce it... &quot;Ele&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The younger Spanish generation also refer to a joint as an &#8220;L&#8221; or as they pronounce it&#8230; &#8220;Ele&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: panos skoulidas</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86598</link>
		<dc:creator>panos skoulidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm... I haven&#039;t heard about that &quot;L&quot; thing either..
Hmmm.. And I thought I knew everything, 420 regarding;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; I haven&#8217;t heard about that &#8220;L&#8221; thing either..<br />
Hmmm.. And I thought I knew everything, 420 regarding;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael kircher</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86597</link>
		<dc:creator>michael kircher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nor any heckling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nor any heckling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david alan harvey</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86584</link>
		<dc:creator>david alan harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FRAMERS INTENT

i did not know what an &quot;L&quot; was...or rather i had never heard that term..hmmmmmm.....and after a quick scan of comments i see no attacks..so did i miss a good bar room brawl or something? damn....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FRAMERS INTENT</p>
<p>i did not know what an &#8220;L&#8221; was&#8230;or rather i had never heard that term..hmmmmmm&#8230;..and after a quick scan of comments i see no attacks..so did i miss a good bar room brawl or something? damn&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael webster</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86583</link>
		<dc:creator>michael webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since you all decided to have your little flame war under my essay, guess I&#039;ll throw in my opinion as well. 

Burnblogfan, although I think it&#039;s fair to question the accuracy of the content of your post about burn publishing proclivities, I see nothing wrong with your having made those observations, nor the manner in which you made them, and can see how you thought they were relevant to my essay. As far as I&#039;m concerned (which is not far, I am not on staff), you are welcome to your anonymousness as long as you don&#039;t use it to post personal attacks, which you haven&#039;t and you don&#039;t seem like the type who would. To me you seem thoughtful and well-educated about photography. I appreciate your consideration of my work, and I hope you stick around and continue commenting.  

If Th-Th-Th-Th-Th-... That&#039;s all, folks, thanks again. It&#039;s been fun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you all decided to have your little flame war under my essay, guess I&#8217;ll throw in my opinion as well. </p>
<p>Burnblogfan, although I think it&#8217;s fair to question the accuracy of the content of your post about burn publishing proclivities, I see nothing wrong with your having made those observations, nor the manner in which you made them, and can see how you thought they were relevant to my essay. As far as I&#8217;m concerned (which is not far, I am not on staff), you are welcome to your anonymousness as long as you don&#8217;t use it to post personal attacks, which you haven&#8217;t and you don&#8217;t seem like the type who would. To me you seem thoughtful and well-educated about photography. I appreciate your consideration of my work, and I hope you stick around and continue commenting.  </p>
<p>If Th-Th-Th-Th-Th-&#8230; That&#8217;s all, folks, thanks again. It&#8217;s been fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86578</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Burnblogfan...

I would agree with Framers Intent... you should stay and come out of the cupboard, but anyway that´s up to you isn&#039;t it...
However I&#039;ve got the feeling the expression &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;Cut your nose to spite your face&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, suits you to a T.
Bye]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burnblogfan&#8230;</p>
<p>I would agree with Framers Intent&#8230; you should stay and come out of the cupboard, but anyway that´s up to you isn&#8217;t it&#8230;<br />
However I&#8217;ve got the feeling the expression <b><i>&#8220;Cut your nose to spite your face&#8221;</i></b>, suits you to a T.<br />
Bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Framers Intent</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86561</link>
		<dc:creator>Framers Intent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 04:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awww c&#039;mon, bbf, stick around. I promise, it&#039;s not all that bad. And Imants is just jumpy cos Imants wants to browse your work is all. I&#039;m not saying we never disagree - as a regular reader you&#039;ll know how hollow that rings, but there&#039;s little maliciousness at play here, and I do think Imants&#039; request to see some of your work a pretty valid one (although I understand if you feel nervous about sharing, but at least just say that, if it&#039;s the case). We&#039;re all liable to get defensive about perceived attacks on Burn, because it is such a good and tightly knit community, and it just feels like something of a misunderstanding, but one that could be worked out. And I&#039;m sure you&#039;d have a unique personality and skill set to offer to the crowd if you stuck around. Like any family, we have our fallings out (and I know this to be true more than most, I suspect) but, for the most part, it&#039;s done out of love. Love for BURN and all that it represents. So please, do stick around and keep commenting. And, when you feel up to it, share your work with us.

And if you and Imants do feel the need to keep beefing, maybe at least move it to a dialogue thread instead?

An &quot;L&quot; - so called for the pattern of the papers prior to rolling. (DAH &amp; &#039;crew&#039; - delete this if unsavoury for this site...please...no offence, I understand, hence my sly comment previously) An &quot;L&quot; is a doobie, a dutchie, a spliff, a draw, a joint, a rolled up smoke of herb.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awww c&#8217;mon, bbf, stick around. I promise, it&#8217;s not all that bad. And Imants is just jumpy cos Imants wants to browse your work is all. I&#8217;m not saying we never disagree &#8211; as a regular reader you&#8217;ll know how hollow that rings, but there&#8217;s little maliciousness at play here, and I do think Imants&#8217; request to see some of your work a pretty valid one (although I understand if you feel nervous about sharing, but at least just say that, if it&#8217;s the case). We&#8217;re all liable to get defensive about perceived attacks on Burn, because it is such a good and tightly knit community, and it just feels like something of a misunderstanding, but one that could be worked out. And I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;d have a unique personality and skill set to offer to the crowd if you stuck around. Like any family, we have our fallings out (and I know this to be true more than most, I suspect) but, for the most part, it&#8217;s done out of love. Love for BURN and all that it represents. So please, do stick around and keep commenting. And, when you feel up to it, share your work with us.</p>
<p>And if you and Imants do feel the need to keep beefing, maybe at least move it to a dialogue thread instead?</p>
<p>An &#8220;L&#8221; &#8211; so called for the pattern of the papers prior to rolling. (DAH &amp; &#8216;crew&#8217; &#8211; delete this if unsavoury for this site&#8230;please&#8230;no offence, I understand, hence my sly comment previously) An &#8220;L&#8221; is a doobie, a dutchie, a spliff, a draw, a joint, a rolled up smoke of herb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burnblogfan</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86560</link>
		<dc:creator>burnblogfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 04:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your sentiment is admirable, FI, and one reason I&#039;ve been reading Burn since before it was burn, when it was Road Trips.  I&#039;ll continue to read and lurk and grab the bit of inspiration I find here now and then.  But as a commenter, I&#039;m outtahere. 

I&#039;ve not been anything but cool, and have responded to Imants prodding with nothing but restraint.  

so consider me chilled... but... what is an &quot;L?&quot;

bbf out]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your sentiment is admirable, FI, and one reason I&#8217;ve been reading Burn since before it was burn, when it was Road Trips.  I&#8217;ll continue to read and lurk and grab the bit of inspiration I find here now and then.  But as a commenter, I&#8217;m outtahere. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not been anything but cool, and have responded to Imants prodding with nothing but restraint.  </p>
<p>so consider me chilled&#8230; but&#8230; what is an &#8220;L?&#8221;</p>
<p>bbf out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Framers Intent</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86553</link>
		<dc:creator>Framers Intent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 01:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IMANTS and BURNBLOGFAN,

While not wanting to step into the fray here, can I ask the both of you to cool it? This seems a little overblown, and is certainly a distraction from MW&#039;s work, which is what we should rightly be discussing in this thread. Both of you seem (to me) to be a little disrespectful to him in getting into it here.

IMANTS - I don&#039;t think burnblogfan meant it as an insult, and DAH took it graciously and in good humour earlier in this thread. I think it was meant as something of a compliment, however nuanced in phrasing.

BURNBLOGFAN - I think Imants has a point. As internet communities go, this one is tiny (and perhaps the better for it, at least, it grows slowly but strongly, firmly, and that&#039;s good). We&#039;re all friends here, in the sense that Burnians generally know where/how to find other Burnians. Either through having discussed and swapped details and personal info, or through linking to e.g. our websites. I feel a bit slack on this point, as I am currently attempting (and failing quite spectacularly at) building my own website. But, as a commercial &#039;tog, I&#039;m guessing that you have one. Would it really hurt to post a link to it, and let people see your work? We&#039;re all here to help each other. Aint no one gonna rag on your work just for being &quot;commercial&quot; (and the older I get, the less I know what that means...).

Anyway, is there any chance we could all swallow an olive branch? Or smoke a chill pill? Or at least share an L? ;-) Peace, guys. One luv.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMANTS and BURNBLOGFAN,</p>
<p>While not wanting to step into the fray here, can I ask the both of you to cool it? This seems a little overblown, and is certainly a distraction from MW&#8217;s work, which is what we should rightly be discussing in this thread. Both of you seem (to me) to be a little disrespectful to him in getting into it here.</p>
<p>IMANTS &#8211; I don&#8217;t think burnblogfan meant it as an insult, and DAH took it graciously and in good humour earlier in this thread. I think it was meant as something of a compliment, however nuanced in phrasing.</p>
<p>BURNBLOGFAN &#8211; I think Imants has a point. As internet communities go, this one is tiny (and perhaps the better for it, at least, it grows slowly but strongly, firmly, and that&#8217;s good). We&#8217;re all friends here, in the sense that Burnians generally know where/how to find other Burnians. Either through having discussed and swapped details and personal info, or through linking to e.g. our websites. I feel a bit slack on this point, as I am currently attempting (and failing quite spectacularly at) building my own website. But, as a commercial &#8216;tog, I&#8217;m guessing that you have one. Would it really hurt to post a link to it, and let people see your work? We&#8217;re all here to help each other. Aint no one gonna rag on your work just for being &#8220;commercial&#8221; (and the older I get, the less I know what that means&#8230;).</p>
<p>Anyway, is there any chance we could all swallow an olive branch? Or smoke a chill pill? Or at least share an L? ;-) Peace, guys. One luv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imants</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86552</link>
		<dc:creator>Imants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[burnblogfan  you cannot be attacked as a person .................remember you are not an individual just a name with no links to treality other than the wwwdot type]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>burnblogfan  you cannot be attacked as a person &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..remember you are not an individual just a name with no links to treality other than the wwwdot type</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imants</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86551</link>
		<dc:creator>Imants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You seem to have placed yourself above everyone here who post with links to real life]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to have placed yourself above everyone here who post with links to real life</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imants</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86550</link>
		<dc:creator>Imants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[burnblogfan  all I am doing is attacking a non entity something that isn&#039;t accountable for his/her whatever it is actions. For all we know you could be a bricklayer having some fun on the net. Being anonomous and making statements is hardly a positive attitude. If we all took your stand there would be no burn, no images, no accountable discussions. You seem to have placed yourself above everyone here he posts with links to real life]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>burnblogfan  all I am doing is attacking a non entity something that isn&#8217;t accountable for his/her whatever it is actions. For all we know you could be a bricklayer having some fun on the net. Being anonomous and making statements is hardly a positive attitude. If we all took your stand there would be no burn, no images, no accountable discussions. You seem to have placed yourself above everyone here he posts with links to real life</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael webster</title>
		<link>http://www.burnmagazine.org/essays/2011/03/michael-webster-brooklyn-carnival/comment-page-2/#comment-86545</link>
		<dc:creator>michael webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burnmagazine.org/?p=8803#comment-86545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I trust most people here recognize the difference beteen a question and an attack. Personally, I don&#039;t think I would have recognized J&#039;ouvert as any relation to Mardi gras and I had definitely never seen anything like it. The kids in costume, sure. Just curious what others have seen?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I trust most people here recognize the difference beteen a question and an attack. Personally, I don&#8217;t think I would have recognized J&#8217;ouvert as any relation to Mardi gras and I had definitely never seen anything like it. The kids in costume, sure. Just curious what others have seen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
