thomas bregulla – everyday

This SlideShowPro photo gallery requires the Flash Player plugin and a web browser with JavaScript enabled.

Hover over the image for navigation and full screen controls

Thomas Bregulla

Everyday

play this essay


There are those everyday repetitive tasks… So small, so little, we don’t even think while doing them. We do them – every day. But without them, something would be missing in that day.

Somehow, that makes these little everyday tasks important. By telling this little story about my everyday life, I wanted to make them special, .

These images show me in my everyday situations. Like they happen, more or less, every day. I made the images with a tripod or just by putting the camera in front of me.

I hope this essay makes us stop and think about the little and everyday things we have in life. The things we often forget that we are doing.

Bio

I was born 1965 in Salzgitter, Germany. After several years in southern Germany, I moved to Bonn where I live today. My main job is in telecommunications, where I am a program manager in an international context. I like to outline a story and take pictures according to that. Photography is a good balance for my current day job, allowing my creativity to go different ways.


Related links

www.flickr.com/photos/tfelix/


Editor’s note:

Please only one comment per person under this essay.. Further discussions should take place under Dialogue..

Many thanks… david alan harvey

65 Responses to “thomas bregulla – everyday”


  • ALL…

    i well knew of course that some of these negative comments would be rolling in on this essay..these comments are almost word for word what Henri Cartier-Bresson said about the work of Martin Parr when he first saw it….the really “funny” thing for me is not Thomas’ pictures (which do not strike me as funny by the way-NOT my sense of humor), but how photographers get so “angry” or “sad” when they see pictures which fall out of their projected aesthetic norm and they see “bad pictures”…i love bad pictures…..i mean , for heavens sake, they are just pictures….a beginning photographer’s reaction to the world around him and using his camera to make some kind of statement…i doubt Thomas is going to continue with this genre OR maybe he will tweak it out and actually do something with it…who knows?

  • So, David, does it seem clever to put bad photos that you don’t even find funny on Burn? Surely there are some photographers whose work you could feature here.

  • I think I would have appreciated this essay more if there were photos taken during Thomas’ day, not just staged moments. If Thomas had found interesting moments in the benign, instead of making funny faces in the benign.

  • JIM…

    what if i only published here work that i personally liked or was my aesthetic?? choke choke…we have published close to 200 essays since we started….why does every essay published need to be definitive? or why would every essay published here be perceived as what i am “doing” with Burn or a direction i am taking? choke choke…not trying to be clever either…just showing a broad spectrum, some of which i like and some of which i do not…some of the “popular” essays here include work that is surely not my personal thing either…sure there are many photographers whose work i could publish and there have been many that i have published and many more that i will publish…most magazines you know what you will get every time…gotta please either the audience or the advertiser…choke choke…besides Jim all you gotta do is wait…relax…new work coming…but if i tried to please you, this whole game would be over…that is exactly what is killing the big media…trying to over please their audience, trying to bend to the advertiser…the magazine and newspaper aesthetic is by nature the aesthetic of the advertisers…surely i am over making my case for this particular essay, but it does make for interesting conversation and please understand that i totally appreciate the comments from you and from others who may question my judgment or the validity of any body of work…isn’t that the point of Burn?

  • DAH

    It will never cease to amaze me how you will continue to enlighten… But I think you would have more luck talking to the proverbial wall than you do with Jim.

    I am not a fan of the essay either, but I also realize that I don’t have to be. I find it fascinating that a newspaper editor/photographer can believe that his view is the only correct view. Tunnel vision is a serious handicap to a photographer.

  • I’m sorry, I just don’t get it.
    I love the everyday moments too, but I like them with some poignancy or beauty or something to make me think or observe and I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here.
    For me this is us seeing a new photographer with a new camera having fun, which is great, and I hope you enjoy your journey, I just don’t know that this is the right place to exhibit your work.

  • I dunno? it seems a little unfair to the photographer to post these images here… it’s kinda like you’re taking the piss out of them. After all you did expect a somewhat negative response? did they?
    Did you consult with them prior to showcasing the work, to make them better prepared for some negative comments?

    Then again as I’m writing this I’m thinking that photographers in general should always be ready for negative commentaries and take it on the chin, it’s part of the developing process.

    But honestly what was the point in posting them? to provoke your audience? To test them to see what the reaction would be? To point out that there are different styles, different tastes?

    Who cares? I can see “bad” photographs and “bad” projects anytime I want… but that’s not what I want to see when I come to a platform which is supposed to be showcasing the work of emerging photographers… and should surely be showcasing the better work being submitted?

    Back to the images themselves.. I’ve seen the same idea done better. much better. funnier, more polished, better aesthetically, compositionally, overall just better.

  • DAH wrote “a beginning photographer’s reaction to the world around him and using his camera to make some kind of statement.”

    Next week on Burn, a toddler with a Kodak.

    In the meantime, check out http://raoulgatepin.com/photographs/mainstream/ (thanks to Waxy for the heads up) for a much more stylish “day in the life” series.

    FWIW, I’m a huge fan of Martin Parr, but I doubt even he could have done much of interest with this clichéd concept.

  • a toddler with a Kodak.
    —————————
    That would still be preferrable to a cuddler with a toad.. Yuk!

  • Hallo Thomas,
    mal was anderes :) Wir laecheln. Viele Gruesse aus Peking.

  • I thought this series was whimsical and clever, not a cliche at all.

  • couldn’t agree more with those who found this essay as nothing but poor photography.

    DAVID…
    i dont want to sound irrespective…
    but…why dont you show us some of the worst of the worst among the tons of essays you’ve received so far?
    something you really disliked, some photography found ridiculous or pathetic….
    just to know what bad photography is, according to the curator…
    Let’s start a separate section, “Le salon des refusés” here on Burn,
    this is a serious suggestion, please show us something I’m sure we would find some true gems.

    cheers

  • “What a breath of fresh air! Lighten up, all you Burn-outs!”

    Excellent, Sidney.

    Stress less people…. Everything is okay. I think it would be really fun to know Thomas.

    I haven’t seen Burn for a while, but I’m glad this essay was up when I did. It makes me realise, like others have said, that we should all just chill out a bit and not take photography too seriously.

    Cheers.

  • Sean above, Sidney et all, I couldn’t agree more.
    We all love photography, we all have our tastes and opinions, we all, we all, we all…

    Why is this one causing so much fuss? There haven’t been so many comments for an essay in a long while. And why is that the main point of most critics seems to be ‘the integrity of burn’? DAH put it very squarely (and maybe he did over-explain himself indeed). It’s just photography that you don’t like. It’s not miasma and it doesn’t need to be always so lofty. Why is everyone taking it so personally, as if we invited to our party a non-cool person and he’s ruining it, is beyond me.

    Don’t take yourself so seriously guys, it’s bad for your hair too!

    (and it IS fun to know Thomas, I promise.)

  • THOMAS! :)))))))))))))

    GOD DAMN, I LOVE THIS! :)))))))))))))))))))

    how the hell did i miss it in november??…that was during my brother’s illness…and so, well i wasnt around long enought…

    but it is sooooo funny and so smart….some of these pics, iconographically, are so frickin brilliant….dr. STrangelove in Germany! )))))

    no time for long comments, but i had only wished i’d seen this upon it’s original publication…

    so sorry…

    this is great, great….

    i only regret i missed all the fighting…i would have written a long,p oetic comment…

    this essay is fabulous!

    hugs
    bob

Leave a Reply

You must login to post a comment.