today i made four posts, including this one….all right here on “road trips”….normally, i would have spread them out over the other sections…most of you want me to go to one blog…..so, i will try it…well, two…i want to leave “student work” as is…but, most of my posts will go on “road trips” for at least the next week to see how it goes…so, pretend that “work in progess” and “friends/family” do not exist…gotta keep ‘em up until i see how this works and can save the material we have written….
so we will see how you like everything posted right here….a test…..to see if you actually read stories which are “at the bottom”….this means i will always be reading and keeping “alive” the top four stories or so…let me know please if this works for you….if i have not made all of your suggestions “come true”, it is simply because we cannot make it technically happen….but, we are working on it….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CetPq_pkHc&feature=related
cool song Michael K… you made me smile again…
Damn, i almost forgot about it… check the base guitar …in the next one…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c88pg2ZdE1w&feature=related
…and oh, little MIKE WHO STOLE MY MIKE, bring me back my mike,tonight…
that chihuahua joke is being done by Rafal, long long time ago.
So you come wayyyy second, little bitch…(laughing).
It’s obvious, YOU PAY NO ATTENTION , AT ALL…
You see, if you wanna play the game right…
you better be reading all the other people’s posts.,. first
not only yours…
o.k, let me let you go now… coz your sensitivity might wet your shoes…
and ” mike who stole my mike”…. please , bring me back my mike…/ unless you gonna use it right…
p.s: I think Michael K, was right by the way… I can’t rhyme for shit… just trying to be fair, here…
peace… little mike thank you for this hilarious night .
my little doglover
Now eat your ham sandwich and go walk your dog….
, idiot
LOL
PEOPLE OF THIS FORUM
PLEASE LET’S LEAVE THE SONGS AND THE JOKES ASIDE FOR A SECOND…
AND LETS PROTECT OURSELVES..
MOST OF US, NAIVELY, BELIEVE THAT WE OWN OUR COPYRIGHT…
JUST BECAUSE WE SAY SO…
OR JUST BECAUSE WE HAVE OUR FILES (DNG’S, NEGS, WHATEVER)
IN OUR DRIVES OR ARCHIVES)….
BULLSHIT…
YOU WILL NEVER WIN A BATTLE IN THE COURT, UNLESS YOU
FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW…
PEACE
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl107.html
LOVE YOU ALL…FROM THE BOTTOM OF MY HEART
Mike:
I saw you called me a sychophant at Magnum…that’s lovely indeed. I should add that none of the lugubrious and personalized attacks against Chris warrant the same kind of name calling.
for someone, above, whose against toxic posts, I wander why you you’ve written that…
anyway, as my son has reminded me…
i’m done with these blogs…
respectfully
bob
ps. you should know that I know Chris personally…my post was not sycophantic but an “argument” about the work..if i’d said i know chris personally, it would have even appeared more as if i were only defending a friend…it’s the work and all that nonsense that was spilled out against the work and him as a peson…i guess my posts here at David’s blog are also sychopantic as well, yes?….
Bob:
I didn’t actually call you a sycophant; I called your post a sycophantic ode. You made a huge jump, from reality into… I don’t know what, something that smells dysfunctional and a little loony. The difference isn’t a quibble… I did not characterize you, I commented on your words.
I’m a surprised you are unable to see the difference… you seem mature, intelligent, and claim a creative background, I’d figure you’ve had enough life experience to be able to separate yourself from your posts. I think, too, you set a very bad example for the younger, less experienced, and thinner-skinned here who may be unable to differentiate themselves from their pictures… critique… focused, honest, thoughtful critique is one very effective way to improve work, and sharpen ideas, even though it may not be always pleasant. It should be encouraged. We don’t have that here. I assume people are here to improve their photographic work… I am slowly coming to to conclusion that I’m wrong… folks are here simply seeking validation.
You reinforce this with your promiscuous and brittle defensive stance. Whether it’s Panos or Chris Anderson who is pressed, in your mind, you’re compelled to throw up the barricades. Both, in their own ways, were perfectly able of defending themselves, and did so, perfectly, in their own ways. Your defensive interventions are superfluous, inappropriate, self-serving and promote an oppressive, dysfunctional atmosphere.
I re-read your post on the Magnum blog. Painful. It’s still sycophantic, and if you are trying to argue the praises of Anderson’s work to someone who doesn’t agree, it fails miserably. I’d be happy to tell you why, but I really don’t have the energy to do that favor for you right now… you are a better writer than this.
Notes:
Lugubrious: wrong word. Bobby Kennedy’s funeral train was lugubrious; Carroll’s posts were boneheaded.
Why the fuck would I care if you “know Chris personally”? Actually, makes you sound more… uh, sycophantic.